Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of JAMES REED, as Director of Social Services of the Monroe County Social Services District, Petitioner, v. CHERYL THOMPSON, Respondent

JOSEPH T. PILATO, J.

The Department of Social Services brought a petition alleging that the ex-wife of their recipient is responsible for his support. There is no allegation that he was a recipient or in need of assistance at the time respondent divorced him. The divorce was granted on a fault ground and provided no support for the defendant (husband).

The statutes creating a responsibility of a spouse to support his espoused (Family Ct. Act, § 413; Social Services Law, § 101, subd. 1) are penal in nature and must be strictly construed. ( Matter of West v. Charles, 46 Misc.2d 200; Matter of Lasher v. Decker, 43 Misc.2d 211.)

An ex-spouse is not a "spouse" under those sections of the law.

It seems logical that if entering into a marriage contract creates certain duties, that an unconditional dissolution of that contract removes them.

Petition is dismissed for failure to state a cause of action.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF REED v. THOMPSON
(May 7, 1974)