Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE OF FLORIDA, PETITIONER, v. REILLY ENTERPRISES, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, D/B/A MINI ART THEATRE, RESPONDENT.

DEKLE, Justice.

This case is before us upon the same general certified questions involving the new Florida obscenity statute Ch. 73-120 as affected by Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 93 S.Ct. 2607, 37 L.Ed.2d 419 (1973) and Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U.S. 49, 93 S.Ct. 2628, 37 L.Ed.2d 446 (1973), as are involved in the similar case of State v. Aiuppa, 298 So.2d 391 (Fla. 1974), decided this date.

The certified questions herein are answered in the same manner as set forth in Aiuppa and this reference thereto shall constitute the answers to said certified questions. We similarly uphold the constitutionality vel non of Ch. 73-120.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, BOYD, McCAIN and CARLTON (Retired), JJ., concur.

ADKINS, C.J. and ERVIN, J., dissent.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. REILLY ENTERPRISES, INC
(May 1, 1974)