WESTCHESTER FIRE INS. CO. v. CONTINENTAL INS, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Richard D. Catenacci, argued the cause for appellant New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Company, ( McElroy, Connell, Foley Geiser, attorneys). Mr. William M. Lake, argued the cause for appellant Continental Insurance Company, ( Dietrich, Stockman Lake, attorneys). Mr. Gerald Kaplan, argued the cause for respondent Motor Club Fire Casualty Co., and Eisner, etc., ( Lieb, Teich Berlin, attorneys; Jerome S. Lieb on the brief). Mr. Edward B. Meredith, argued the cause for respondents Westchester Fire Insurance Company and Holcombe, ( Meredith, Meredith Chase, attorneys). Mr. Gregory V. Hopkins argued the cause for respondents Potent, ( Frank V. Walsh, Jr., attorney).

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

WESTCHESTER FIRE INSURANCE CO., RICHARD B. HOLCOMBE, ALICE HOLCOMBE ANDWILBUR S. HOLCOMBE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. THE CONTINENTAL INSURANCECOMPANIES, NEW JERSEY MANUFACTURERS INSURANCE CO., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS ANDMOTOR CLUB FIRE CASUALTY CO., JACKIE W. EISNER, ETC.,DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.ELMER RICHARD POTENT, GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR RICHARD M. POTENT, AN INFANT,ELMER RICHARD POTENT AND CHARLOTTE POTENT, INDIVIDUALLY,PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division. Westchester Fire Insurance Co., Richard B. Holcombe, Alice Holcombe and Wilbur S. Holcombe v. The Continental Insurance Companies New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance Co., Motor Club Fire Casualty Co., Jackie W. Eisner, etc., and Elmer Richard Potent, Guardian Ad Litem for Richard M. Potent, an infant, Elmer Richard Potent and Charlotte Potent, individually, vs. Jackie W. Eisner, Hallie Eisner, Elmer Eisner, Sr., and Richard B. Holcombe, Sr., etc, 126 N.J. Super.

For reversal — None.

For affirmance — Justices JACOBS, HALL, MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN and PASHMAN — 5.

WESTCHESTER FIRE INS. CO. v. CONTINENTAL INS

Comments