Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. THEODORE HEINRICH, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM:

Defendant appeals from a conviction of violating 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (possession with intent to distribute marijuana).

Defendant was stopped on July 29, 1973, at the Temecula checkpoint. Pursuant to that stop the marijuana was discovered.

We held in United States v. Bowen, 500 F.2d 960 (9th Cir. 1974), that such stops made after June 21, 1973, are unconstitutional when they do not occur at the functional equivalent of the border.

The Temecula checkpoint is 72 miles north of the international boundary and is not the functional equivalent of a border.

The evidence discovered pursuant to the stop should have been suppressed.

Reversed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UNITED STATES v. HEINRICH
(Jun 14, 1974)