DEVANEY v. SARNO, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. John T. Dolan argued the cause for appellants (
Crummy, O'Neill, Del Deo Dolan, attorneys
Herzfeld Rubin, P.C. of the New York Bar, of Counsel). Mr. Arthur C. Gundersdorf argued the cause for

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. John T. Dolan argued the cause for appellants (
Crummy, O'Neill, Del Deo Dolan, attorneys
Herzfeld Rubin, P.C. of the New York Bar, of Counsel). Mr. Arthur C. Gundersdorf argued the cause for

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

ROBERT A. DEVANEY, AN INFANT BY HIS GUARDIAN AD LITEM JOHN R. DEVANEY ANDJOHN R. DEVANEY AND JEANNE DEVANEY, INDIVIDUALLY, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. LOUIS SARNO AND CENTRAL VOLKSWAGEN INC., DEFENDANTS AND VOLKSWAGEN OFAMERICA, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division, 125 N.J. Super. 414.

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES, and Justices JACOBS, HALL, MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN and CLIFFORD — 7.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.