AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

SCHENECTADY STEEL CO., INC., Appellant, v. BRUNO TRIMPOLI GENERAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., Respondent, et al., Defendant.

MEMORANDUM. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed on the record before us.

We agree with the majority below that once the "time of the essence" provision in the contract was waived by the general contractor, performance by the steel supplier within a reasonable time was all that was required. We would not, however, concur with the majority's reasoning insofar as it is indicated that the "time of the essence" element was reimposed; but upon any view of the evidence the lesser standard of reasonable time was not even complied with and we thus find no cause for disturbing the result appealed from. We would further indicate that on the facts of this case it is immaterial whether article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code applies.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES and WACHTLER concur in memorandum; Judges RABIN and STEVENS taking no part.

Order affirmed, with costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SCHENECTADY STEEL CO. INC. v. TRIMPOLI GEN. CONSTR
(Jul 11, 1974)