UNITED STATES v. MILLER

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 73-1083.

Attorney(S)

Ray Gene Smith, Wichita Falls,
(Court-appointed), for defendant-
Anthony J. P. Farris, U.S.
, Robert G. Darden,
U.S.
, Houston,
, for plaintiff-

Judges

John Robert Brown
John Minor Wisdom
Walter Pettus Gewin
Griffin Boyette Bell
William Homer Thornberry
James Plemon Coleman
Irving Loeb Goldberg
Robert Andrew Ainsworth
Charles Clark
Thomas Gibbs Gee

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 73-1083.

Attorney(S)

Ray Gene Smith, Wichita Falls,
(Court-appointed), for defendant-
Anthony J. P. Farris, U.S.
, Robert G. Darden,
U.S.
, Houston,
, for plaintiff-

Judges

John Robert Brown
John Minor Wisdom
Walter Pettus Gewin
Griffin Boyette Bell
William Homer Thornberry
James Plemon Coleman
Irving Loeb Goldberg
Robert Andrew Ainsworth
Charles Clark
Thomas Gibbs Gee

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. ERNEST WESLEY MILLER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM:

The Court has considered the petition for rehearing en banc with respect to the retroactivity issue only, and is of the opinion that the decision of the panel 5 Cir., 492 F.2d 37 is correct. The petition for rehearing is in all other respects denied by the panel.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. ERNEST WESLEY MILLER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Comments