Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MYERS et al. v. MOBILE AMERICA CORPORATION et al.

PANNELL, Presiding Judge.

Where, as in the present case, an action was brought by a plaintiff against two defendants who cross claimed against plaintiff and three others as joint tortfeasors, and the trial judge sustained a motion of the three others to be dismissed as parties because of lack of venue, and the order of dismissal contains no express determination there is no reason for delay, and no express direction for the entry of an appealable judgment, such order "does not terminate the action as to any of the claims or parties, and the order or other form of decision is subject to revision at any time before the entry of judgment adjudicating all the claims and the rights and liabilities of all the parties," (Section 54 of the Civil Practice Act; Ga. L. 1966, pp. 609, 658; Code Ann. § 81A-154 (b)), and in the absence of a certificate of review, the order is not appealable, and the appeal, on motion, must be dismissed. Davis v. Roper, 119 Ga. App. 442 ( 167 S.E.2d 685); White v. Wright, 124 Ga. App. 151 ( 183 S.E.2d 90); Williams v. Horn, 124 Ga. App. 485 ( 184 S.E.2d 198).

Appeal dismissed. Clark and Webb, JJ., concur.

SUBMITTED MAY 10, 1974 — DECIDED JULY 10, 1974.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MYERS v. MOBILE AMERICA CORPORATION
(Jul 10, 1974)