Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE STATE, EX REL. BOARD OF TAX APPEALS, v. SMITH, AUDITOR, ET AL.

Taxation — Real property — Assessment — Abstract submitted by county auditor — Board of Tax Appeals — Corrections ordered by board — Duty of auditor mandatory — Mandamus — Writ available to enforce order of board — R.C. 5715.26.

Per Curiam.

R.C. 5715.01 imposes upon the Board of Tax Appeals the duty to "direct and supervise the assessment for taxation of all real property." See, also, State, ex rel. Park Invest. Co., v. Bd. of Tax Appeals, supra. R.C. 5715.23 requires each county auditor to transmit to the Board of Tax Appeals an abstract of all the real property in each taxing district in his county setting forth the aggregate amount and valuation of each class as it appears on his tax list. To make such direction and supervision effective, R.C. 5715.24 requires that the Board of Tax Appeals shall determine whether the real property and the various classes thereof have been assessed by an equal and uniform rule at taxable value and, if necessary, revise the valuation as listed by the auditor, in order that every class of real property "shall be listed and valued for taxation by an equal and uniform rule according to its taxable value."

The Board of Tax Appeals has reviewed and disapproved the abstract in question and has issued an order to correct the abstract. R.C. 5715.26 imposes upon the county auditor a mandatory ministerial duty to comply with that order. State, ex rel. Curry, v. Monroe (1953), 159 Ohio St. 1, 3, and Hammond v. Winder (1919), 100 Ohio St. 433.

R.C. 5703.39 states that the orders of the Board of Tax Appeals may "be enforced by proceedings in mandamus, injunction, or other appropriate proceeding." See, also, R.C. 5715.31.

There is nothing in the record to show a gross abuse of discretion or unlawfulness upon the part of the Board of Tax Appeals with respect to its order.

Therefore, the writ of mandamus is allowed.

Writ allowed.

O'NEILL, C.J., HERBERT, CORRIGAN, STERN, CELEBREZZE, W. BROWN and P. BROWN, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE, EX REL. BOARD OF TAX APPEALS, v. SMITH
(Jul 17, 1974)