Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. ROBERT FONSECA, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC [2] (Prior opinion 490 F.2d 464.)

PER CURIAM:

In view of the Supreme Court's recent decision in Dorsynski v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 94 S.Ct. 3042, 40 L.Ed.2d ___ (1974) relative to the sentencing requirements to be met by the district court under subsection 5010(d) of the Federal Youth Corrections Act, 18 U.S.C. § 5005, et seq., petitioner Fonseca's petition for rehearing is granted to the extent that the matter is remanded for resentencing under the guidelines of Dorsynski. In all other respects the petition is denied.

The petition for rehearing en banc is denied and no member of this panel nor Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure; Local Fifth Circuit Rule 12), the petition for rehearing en banc is denied.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UNITED STATES v. FONSECA
(Aug 9, 1974)