Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

INNIS FONTENOT ET AL., RELATOR, v. STATE OF LOUISIANA, THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS, RESPONDENT.

ORDER

[3] PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appellants' motion to remand this case is denied. It has not been established that either party requested the trial judge to assign written reasons prior to his decision of the case. Plaintiffs appellants are not entitled to require written reasons absent a request made known to the trial judge prior to rendition of his decision. Louisiana Constitution Article VII, § 43; LSA-C.C.P. art. 1917.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FONTENOT v. STATE
(Sep 4, 1974)