AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

MARVIN L. DIETRICH AND MARJORIE DIETRICH, APPELLANTS, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, APPELLEE.

PER CURIAM.

Upon a careful consideration of the record, the briefs and oral argument, the Court has concluded that the factual findings of the Tax Court are not clearly erroneous, that its decision is based upon a correct interpretation of the law as applied to the pleadings and the facts of the case, and that an opinion would have no precedential value. See Leathers v. United States, 471 F.2d 856 (8th Cir. 1972); Wertzberger v. United States, 441 F.2d 1166 (8th Cir. 1971). For these reasons the judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed without opinion.

See Rule 14 of the Rules of this Court.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

DIETRICH v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
(Sep 25, 1974)