Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ROBERT RICE, Appellant.

MEMORANDUM. The record, following appellant's retrial, discloses overwhelming evidence to support the guilty verdict and the order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The evidence, quite apart from the oral and written admissions made by appellant, consisted of eyewitness testimony of his presence during and participation in the homicidal acts and events culminating in the victim's death, as well as the evidence of the presence of appellant's fingerprints at the scene; all of this, despite his alibi defense claiming he was blocks away from the scene at the time of the occurrence. We have also considered appellant's contention that he was entitled to a hearing de novo as to the voluntariness of his confession and that a portion of the testimony presented by the prosecution violated the rule in Bruton v. United States ( 391 U.S. 123). As to this latter claim, the rule was not violated and, in any event, any such alleged error was not preserved for review. These contentions lack merit, as do appellant's remaining claims.

Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, RABIN, STEVENS and WITMER concur.

Designated pursuant to section 2 of article VI of the State Constitution.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. RICE
(Oct 7, 1974)