Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

ELOISE BROWN, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. GENERAL ANILINE AND FILMCORPORATION, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES, Justices HALL, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN and CLIFFORD, and Judge KOLOVSKY — 6.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BROWN v. GENERAL ANILINE AND FILM CORP
(Oct 8, 1974)