Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. WILLIAM PRENTIS TUCKER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant's assertion that 18 U.S.C. App. § 1202(a), prohibiting a convicted felon from receipt of a firearm which has traveled in interstate commerce, does not apply to him, is without merit. He had three prior convictions for conspiracy to violate Internal Revenue Liquor Laws (then 18 U.S.C. § 88, now 18 U.S.C. § 371), actual violation ( 26 U.S.C. § 5174), and possession of an illegal distillery ( 26 U.S.C. § 5601), all felonies. 18 U.S.C. App. § 1202(c)(2) defines a felony as:

an offense punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year, but does not include any offense . . . classified as a misdemeanor . . .

The statute does not distinguish between violent and non-violent felonies. Cf. United States v. Lincoln, 4 Cir., 1973, 487 F.2d 222, cert. denied 415 U.S. 976, 94 S.Ct. 1562, 39 L.Ed.2d 872 (1974).

Appellant's allegation that the firearm in question was illegally seized is also without merit. The gun was in plain view on the front seat of appellant's car; under the circumstances here a warrantless search was lawful.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UNITED STATES v. TUCKER
(Oct 14, 1974)