Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

JAMES WILLYERD, PETITIONER, v. ANDY ANDERSON AND LILA J. STEVENS, A/K/A L.J. ANDERSON, RESPONDENTS.

ADKINS, Chief Justice:

By petition for writ of certiorari, we have for review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, (Willyerd v. Anderson, 291 So.2d 137), which allegedly conflicts with the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, in Lafleur v. Castlewood International Corporation, 285 So.2d 449. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Florida Constitution, Article V, Section 3(b)( 3), F.S.A.

We have dispensed with oral argument pursuant to Rule 3.10, F.A.R. and on authority of our decision in Clement v. Aztec Sales, Inc., 297 So.2d 1, opinion filed June 19, 1974, the decision of the District Court of Appeal is reversed and the cause remanded with directions that the District Court consider petitioner's appeal on the merits.

It is so ordered.

ROBERTS, ERVIN, BOYD and OVERTON, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WILLYERD v. ANDERSON
(Oct 16, 1974)