GRASSO v. DEITER, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Sheldon R. Franklin argued the cause for appellants (
Franklin
Keck, attorneys). No appearances were made on behalf of

Judges

PER CURIAM.

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Sheldon R. Franklin argued the cause for appellants (
Franklin
Keck, attorneys). No appearances were made on behalf of

Judges

PER CURIAM.

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

MICHAEL GRASSO, MARGARET GRASSO, AND MICHAEL GRASSO, JR.,PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. JOHN DEITER, HIS HEIRS, DEVISEES AND PERSONALREPRESENTATIVES, AND HIS, THEIR OR ANY OF THEIR SUCCESSORS IN RIGHT, TITLEAND INTEREST, AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division, 126 N.J. Super. 365. For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices JACOBS, HALL, MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN and CLIFFORD — 7.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

GRASSO v. DEITER

MICHAEL GRASSO, MARGARET GRASSO, AND MICHAEL GRASSO, JR.,PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. JOHN DEITER, HIS HEIRS, DEVISEES AND PERSONALREPRESENTATIVES, AND HIS, THEIR OR ANY OF THEIR SUCCESSORS IN RIGHT, TITLEAND INTEREST, AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Comments