Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BATTLE v. THE STATE.

UNDERCOFLER, Justice.

Appellant was convicted of the murder of his wife and sentenced to life imprisonment. Appellant's counsel states in his brief, "The only error raised in this appeal is whether the court should have charged on the law of voluntary and involuntary manslaughter." Appellant's defense was accident. A review of the record shows the only issue was murder or accident. Therefore the trial court did not err as contended. The evidence is not set out in this opinion because it would serve no purpose other than in the decision of this case.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

SUBMITTED SEPTEMBER 20, 1974 — DECIDED OCTOBER 17, 1974.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BATTLE v. STATE
(Oct 17, 1974)