Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

HARRY GOLDKLANG, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCECOMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the majority of the Appellate Division.

Two members of the Court would reverse substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Meanor in his dissent reported at 130 N.J. Super. 307 (1974).

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices JACOBS, SULLIVAN and PASHMAN and Judge CONFORD — 5.

For reversal — Justices HALL and CLIFFORD — 2.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GOLDKLANG v. METROPOLITAN LIFE
(Oct 22, 1974)