Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. George L. Seltzer argued the cause for appellant (
  • Valentine
  • Seltzer, attorneys). No appearance was made on behalf of
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Click here to upload
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
  • Mr. George L. Seltzer argued the cause for appellant (
  • Valentine
  • Seltzer, attorneys). No appearance was made on behalf of
Judges
  • PER CURIAM.
See more information ...
Smart Summary

EARL PRICKETT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT v. MATILDA ALLARD, THE ISSUES OF MATILDAALLARD NOW OR HEREAFTER BORN DURING THE LIFETIME OF MATILDA ALLARD, THEIRHEIRS, DEVISEES, PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES AND THEIR OR ANY OF THEIRSUCCESSORS IN RIGHT, TITLE AND INTEREST; THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY,DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons exressed by the Appellate Division, 126 N.J. Super. 438.

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES and Justices JACOBS, HALL, MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN and CLIFFORD — 7.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.
Try AI Pro free for 7 days Upgrade to AI Pro

Comments

PRICKETT v. ALLARD
(Oct 22, 1974)