WALLINGTON HOME OWNERS v. BOR. OF WALLINGTON, N.J., Judgment, Law, casemine.com

Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Report a problem

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Malcolm Blum argued the cause for appellants ( Mr. Barry W. Sirota, attorney). Mr. Marvin Olick argued the cause for respondent Borough of Wallington (
Gruen, Sorkow
Sorkow, attorneys). Mr. Lawrence G. Goodman argued the cause for respondent Nuckel (
Goodman, Stoldt
Breslin, attorneys).

Judges

Are you a practicing lawyer?

Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.

Upload pleading to use the new AI search

Click here to upload

Cites

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Attorney(S)

Mr. Malcolm Blum argued the cause for appellants ( Mr. Barry W. Sirota, attorney). Mr. Marvin Olick argued the cause for respondent Borough of Wallington (
Gruen, Sorkow
Sorkow, attorneys). Mr. Lawrence G. Goodman argued the cause for respondent Nuckel (
Goodman, Stoldt
Breslin, attorneys).

Judges

See more information ...

Smart Summary

WALLINGTON HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION, AN UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATION, ANDANDREW P. VASCO, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. BOROUGH OF WALLINGTON, AMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND JAMES NUCKEL,INTERVENOR-RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division, 130 N.J. Super. 461.

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES, Justices JACOBS, HALL, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN and CLIFFORD and Judge CONFORD — 7.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.