Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed (see Matter of Paciona v. Marshall, 35 N.Y.2d 289). We would also note that the petitioner made a timely motion to dismiss the indictment alleging illegality of the jury selection process. Appellate review of a denial of that motion, if available at all, would only be on direct appeal from a judgment of conviction if one ensued. (CPL 470.15, subd. 1; CPLR 7801, subd. 1; cf. People v. Chestnut, 26 N.Y.2d 481.)
Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, RABIN and STEVENS concur in Per Curiam opinion.
Judgment affirmed, without costs.