Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

FOLEY et al. v. SHANAHAN et al.; and

CLARK, Judge.

1. Piece-meal review is not favored by the courts. "[I]n the absence of an express determination by the court that there is no just reason for delay and an express direction for entry of judgment, no order or decision which adjudicates with respect to fewer than all the claims or all the parties is final or appealable. [Code Ann. § 81A-154 and cits.].

"Since there is no appeal from a final, appealable judgment in the record and no certificate for immediate review as provided for by Code Ann. § 6-701 (a, 2) this appeal must be dismissed under authority of the above cases." Rodriguez v. Newby, 130 Ga. App. 139, 140 ( 202 S.E.2d 565).

2. In view of the dismissal of the main appeal, it is unnecessary to consider the cross appeal.

Appeals dismissed. Bell, C. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

SUBMITTED NOVEMBER 4, 1974 — DECIDED NOVEMBER 7, 1974.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

FOLEY v. SHANAHAN
(Nov 7, 1974)