Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

OTTO J. CIANCIOTTO AND RUTH CIANCIOTTO, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. SIDNEY MILSTEIN AND MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF CLOSTER,DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed essentially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division in its majority opinion, 132 N.J. Super. 83.

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES, Justices JACOBS, MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN and CLIFFORD and Judge KOLOVSKY — 7.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CIANCIOTTO v. MILSTEIN
(Feb 18, 1975)