AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. REGINALD SALIK, Appellant.

Judgment rendered February 13, 1973, Supreme Court, New York County, convicting defendant upon a jury verdict of robbery in the first degree, grand larceny in the third degree, possession of a weapon, assault in the second degree and resisting arrest, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of reversing the conviction on the grand larceny count and dismissing that count of the indictment and, as so modified, the judgment is affirmed. As the People properly point out, the grand larceny count is an "Inclusory concurrent count" (CPL 300.30, subd. 4) of the robbery conviction. As such, a conviction upon the robbery count is deemed a dismissal of the lesser inclusory count of grand larceny (CPL 300.40, subd. 3, par. [b]; People v. Pyles, 44 A.D.2d 784).

Concur — Stevens, J.P., Murphy, Lupiano, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. SALIK
(Mar 3, 1975)