Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Robert Daniel SMITH v. STATE of Arkansas

1. CRIMINAL LAW — PRETRIAL JAIL TIME, DENIAL OF CREDIT FOR — CONSTITUTIONALITY. — Denial of credit for pretrial jail time solely because of a defendant's indigency amounts to an unconstitutional discrimination based on wealth, absent some compelling government interest. 2. CRIMINAL LAW — VALIDITY OF TRIAL COURT'S ACTION — REVIEW. — When the record shows that a defendant was not given the right of allocation prior to sentencing, the Supreme Court cannot indulge in the presumption that the trial court performed its duty according to law, or exercised its discretion pursuant to Ark. Stat. Ann. 43-2813 (Supp. 1973), in denying jail time.

CONLEY BYRD, Justice.

The sole issue on this appeal is whether appellant Robert Daniel Smith, an indigent, is entitled to credit for jail time served by him prior to conviction.

The record shows that appellant was held in custody from December 8, 1973, until the date of his trial before the court on January 11, 1974. The record also shows that appellant was sentenced and committed to the penitentiary for 15 years upon a charge of robbery with a firearm without being given the opportunity to show why he should not receive the full 15 year sentence.

Thus unlike Coleman v. State, 257 Ark. 538 518 S.W.2d 487 (1975), the record shows appellant was not given the right of allocation and consequently, we cannot indulge in the presumption that the trial court did its duty according to law or that it exercised its discretion pursuant to Ark. Stat. Ann. 43-2813 (Supp. 1973), in denying jail time, Shelton v. State, 255 Ark. 932, 504 S.W.2d 348 (1974). Consequently, this case seems to be controlled by Smith v. State, 256 Ark. 425, 508 S.W.2d 54 (1974), where we pointed out that the denial of jail time solely because of the indigency of the defendant amounts to an unconstitutional discrimination based on wealth, absent some "compelling government interest."

Reversed and remanded with directions to give credit for jail time.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SMITH v. STATE
(Mar 10, 1975)