Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of EDWARD WILKINSON, JR., Appellant, v. BETTY S. LINDSAY et al., and BARBARA SEMONITE et al., Respondents. GARY GREENWALD, Inter

Order affirmed, without costs. By virtue of limitations of time on the parties, including the fact that the village election is to be held tomorrow, the record is hardly satisfactory to resolve the issues upon which the proceeding turns. It appears that subdivision 2 of section 204 of the Election Law would still permit the petitioner to challenge the voting of absentee ballots, if not the registration, of the respondent voters. In so holding, we do not imply that a proceeding brought under section 331 of the Election Law does not lie to challenge registrations. As a practical matter, however, the adequacy of notice and opportunity to respond to the overbroad and disjunctive allegations in the petition are absent in this accelerated proceeding.

Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF WILKINSON v. LINDSAY
(Mar 17, 1975)