AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. WILLIAM BENJAMIN, Appellant.

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered June 14, 1973, convicting him of murder, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, and new trial ordered. Viewing defendant's trial testimony in the light most favorable to him, as required (People v Steele, 26 N.Y.2d 526, 529), it is apparent that an instruction to the jury on the defense of justification was called for in this case (see People v Sanza, 37 A.D.2d 632). The failure of the trial court to instruct the jury on this issue requires a reversal and a new trial. The fact that no exception was taken to the charge as given and that no request to charge was made "is of no moment * * * where a [homicide] conviction is founded upon an erroneous charge" (People v Rainey, 34 A.D.2d 557; People v Almond, 37 A.D.2d 571; People v Butts, 14 A.D.2d 486). Latham, Acting P.J., Cohalan, Christ, Brennan and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. BENJAMIN
(Mar 31, 1975)