AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of STEPHAN KLEIN et al., Appellants, v. HARRY J. SEIGEL et al., Constituting the Board of Zoning and Appeals of the Town of North Hempstead, Respondents.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review respondents' determination which denied (1) petitioners' application for a conditional use permit and (2) related applications for area variances, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered October 4, 1974, which confirmed the determination without a hearing. Judgment affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements. As petitioners failed to sustain their burden of proving that the proposed use meets the standards specified in the applicable zoning ordinance, the board properly denied their application (see Matter of Knight v Bodkin, 41 A.D.2d 413; cf. Matter of North Shore Steak House v Board of Appeals of Inc. Vil. of Thomaston, 30 N.Y.2d 238). The board's reliance on Findings Nos. 16 and 17 was unwarranted, but there are, as hereinabove stated, other and ample grounds which support affirmance. Gulotta, P.J., Martuscello, Latham and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF KLEIN v. SEIGEL
(Apr 21, 1975)