Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

E. ROLLE ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. WILLIAM D. JUDGE AND ALLIE MAE JOHNSON, APPELLEES.

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the briefs and oral argument and upon review of the record on appeal we are of the opinion that appellants have failed to clearly demonstrate reversible error. In particular, there was competent substantial evidence to support the trial court's determination that a quorum did not exist on August 6, 1971, the date on which action was taken by the appellant to change the name of the church withdrawing its association from the Primitive Baptist congregation and diverting the use of church property. The trial court's declaration that the actions taken on August 6 were null and void and the relief granted to the appellees was consistent with the foregoing.

Accordingly, the final judgment is affirmed.

MAGER and DOWNEY, JJ., and ALDERMAN, JAMES E., Associate Judge, concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ROLLE v. JUDGE
(Apr 18, 1975)