Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

Bodegard Mitchell, Appellant, v. Commonwealth of Pennsyl

Unemployment compensation — Voluntary termination — Cause of a necessitous and compelling nature — Unemployment Compensation Law, Act 1936, December 5, P.L. (1937) 2897 — Caring for family members.

1. An employe voluntarily terminating employment to care for a sick family member does not leave work for a cause of a necessitous and compelling nature under the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act 1936, December 5, P.L. (1937) 2897 and is ineligible for unemployment compensation benefits. [502-3]

OPINION BY JUDGE CRUMLISH, JR., April 23, 1975:

This is a direct administrative appeal by a claimant from an order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review affirming a denial of an interstate benefits claim on the ground that claimant had voluntarily terminated his employment with a Pennsylvania employer without cause of a necessitous and compelling nature under section 402(b)(1) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess., P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P. S. § 802(b)(1). Claimant's admitted conduct of jumping ship to attend to his hospitalized brother in California brings him within our recent decision in Crumbling v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 14 Pa. Commw. 546, 322 A.2d 746 (1974). We held in Crumbling that section 402(b)(1) must be construed together with section 402(b)(2), 43 P. S. § 802(b)(2), rendering ineligible a claimant voluntarily terminating his or her employment for marital, filial or domestic obligations or circumstances, so that a voluntary termination to care for sick family members will not constitute cause of a necessitous or compelling nature under section 402(b)(1). As we indicated in Crumbling, we are bound by the expressed will of the Legislature.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 23rd day of April, 1975, the order of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MITCHELL v. UNEM. COM. BD. REVIEW
(Apr 23, 1975)