Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE STATE v. SMITH.

QUILLIAN, Judge.

This is an appeal by the state from an order of the trial court sustaining defendant's motion to suppress evidence seized after arrest of the defendant.

The facts of this case raise only the question of whether the information within the knowledge of the arresting officer was sufficient to establish probable cause for the arrest of the defendant. The state relied upon one witness, whose testimony was vague, equivocal, and self-contradictory. In a motion to suppress, the judge sits as the trier of fact. Kelly v. State, 129 Ga. App. 131 ( 198 S.E.2d 910). Credibility of the witness and the weight to be accorded his testimony rests solely with the trier of fact and he is not obligated to believe a witness even though he is not contradicted by other witnesses. Chaffin v. Community Loan c. Co., 67 Ga. App. 410 ( 20 S.E.2d 435). He may accept a portion of the testimony of a witness and reject another portion. Garrison v. Garmon, 94 Ga. App. 868, 872 ( 96 S.E.2d 550). In essence, credibility and weight, and resolution of conflicts or inconsistencies within the testimony of a witness are matters to be determined by the judge in a motion to suppress. In the absence of evidence of record demanding a finding contrary to the judge's determination, this court will not reverse the ruling sustaining a motion to suppress.

Judgment affirmed. Pannell, P.J., and Clark, J., concur.

ARGUED MARCH 11, 1975 — DECIDED APRIL 23, 1975.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. SMITH
(Apr 23, 1975)