AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

In the Matter of WILLIAM T. BROCKMAN, Respondent, v. CARL J. DORDELMAN, as Chief of the Village of East Hampton Police Department, et al., Appellants.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to compel appellants to remit back pay, etc., to petitioner for the period of his suspension, which, pending the hearing of formal charges against him, exceeded the statutory period of 30 days (see Civil Service Law, § 75, subd 3), the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered August 28, 1974, which granted the application. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs, and proceeding dismissed on the merits. Since the delay in holding the hearing which eventually resulted in petitioner's discharge was due exclusively to his conduct in procuring repeated stays in his attempt to permanently enjoin the hearing, he is in no position to invoke the statutory limit (Matter of Bentley v Henninger, 10 A.D.2d 900; cf. Matter of Amkraut v Hults, 21 A.D.2d 260). Latham, Acting P.J., Cohalan, Christ, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF BROCKMAN v. DORDELMAN
(May 12, 1975)