Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. GLENDA ELLEN COOPER, Appellant.

Order affirmed. Although it is difficult, if not impossible, to avoid a conclusion that defendant was psychotic, paradoxically the record also established beyond any doubt, and also beyond this court's review, that defendant was legally sane. (Compare Penal Law, § 30.05 with ALI Model Penal Code, § 4.01 [Proposed Official Draft (1962)].) There were no objections to the charge to the jury. Hence, there are no purported errors in the charge which this court may review within its limited jurisdiction (see CPL 470.05, subd 2; 470.35, subd 1; People v Rossi, 11 N.Y.2d 379, 383).

Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER and FUCHSBERG. Taking no part: Judge COOKE.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. COOPER
(Jun 4, 1975)