Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

PITTS v. PEOPLES LOAN FINANCE CORPORATION OF ROME. CAMPBELL

QUILLIAN, Judge.

The appeals involve the same issues and are considered together.

1. Appellant, defendant below, who purchased a vehicle and gave a note therefor pursuant to Code Ann. Ch. 96-10 (Ga. L. 1967, p. 674 et seq.) contends that he was charged interest in excess of that allowed under Code Ann. § 96-1004 (Ga. L. 1967, pp. 674, 679; 1970, pp. 101, 103) since the cost of insurance was included in the amount financed, the "unpaid balance."

Insurance costs and other authorized charges are properly included in "unpaid balance" and subject to the finance charge. Pike v. Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp., 125 Ga. App. 83, 85 ( 186 S.E.2d 482); Code Ann. § 96-1004 (b), supra; Regulation Z, 12 C.F.R. § 226.8 (c). See Holden v. Peoples, Inc. of Rome, 122 Ga. App. 269 ( 176 S.E.2d 516), construing the former law. See also Leach v. Midland-Guardian Co. 127 Ga. App. 562, 564 ( 194 S.E.2d 260).

2. The remaining enumerations of error are without merit.

Judgments affirmed. Pannell, P. J., and Clark, J., concur.

QUILLIAN, Judge.

SUBMITTED MAY 7, 1975 — DECIDED JUNE 6, 1975.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PITTS v. PEOPLES LOAN FINANCE CORPORATION OF ROME
(Jun 6, 1975)