Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

GUYTON v. MARTIN FINANCE CORPORATION.

BELL, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from the denial of a motion to set aside a default judgment on a note, which was attached to the complaint, drawn under the Georgia Industrial Loan Act. It contained an acceleration clause in the event of default by the debtor for the acceleration of all remaining instalments, including earned and unearned interest. Reversal is required under our holdings in Lawrimore v. Sun Finance Co., 131 Ga. App. 96 ( 205 S.E.2d 110), aff'd., 232 Ga. 637, and Hardy v. G. A. C. Finance Corp., 131 Ga. App. 282 ( 205 S.E.2d 526), aff'd., 232 Ga. 632. It makes no difference that the suit in this case was brought with an allowance for unearned interest. The controlling factor is that the plaintiff contracted for the collection of unearned interest which violates the Industrial Loan Act and voids the obligation. Lawrimore v. Sun Finance Co., supra, and Hardy v. G. A. C. Finance Corp., supra. Accordingly, as violation appears on the face of the record, it was error to deny the motion to set aside.

Judgment reversed. Webb and Marshall, JJ., concur.

BELL, Chief Judge.

ARGUED MAY 6, 1975 — DECIDED JUNE 10, 1975.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

GUYTON v. MARTIN FINANCE CORPORATION
(Jun 10, 1975)