Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

ST. PAUL BAR RESTAURANT EQUIPMENT COMPANY v. JOSEPH DI MARTINO AND ANOTHER.

Appeal and error — review — findings of trial court.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the St. Paul municipal court denying plaintiff's motion for a new trial or amended findings and conclusions of law in an action on an account for supplies furnished by plaintiff to defendants.

The trial court found that the supplies were delivered to the restaurant operated by a corporate entity which has since become defunct and ceased to operate; and that plaintiff, contrary to its contention that defendants were operating the restaurant as a partnership, was doing business with the restaurant as a corporation.

We have examined the record and the authorities submitted and conclude that the findings of the trial court are not clearly erroneous.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ST. PAUL BAR RES. EQUIP. CO. v. MARTINO
(Jun 13, 1975)