AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of RUSSELL SAGE COLLEGE et al., Appellants, v. STATE DIVISION OF HUMAN RIGHTS et al., Respondents. (And Another Proceeding.)

In each proceeding: Order affirmed, with costs. Prohibition does not lie (Matter of Greater N.Y. Corp. v Commission of Human Rights, 27 N.Y.2d 898). Moreover, the remedy is discretionary and this court generally would not review the withholding of the remedy (Cohen and Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, §§ 149, 159).

Concur: Chief Judge BREITEL and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF RUSSELL SAGE CLG. v. ST. DIV., HUMAN RIGHTS
(Jun 18, 1975)