AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

JOSEPH COTTER, Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK et al., Respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered November 25, 1974, denying plaintiff's motion to restore the case to the calendar, unanimously reversed, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, and said motion granted, without costs or disbursements. Though the instant action is of ancient vintage and had been on the calendar numerous times, counsel's failure to appear on the date fixed for trial was due to his actual engagement in trial of another case in Supreme Court, Suffolk County. Under such circumstance, the cause should have been "held subject" (22 N.Y.CRR 660.5[e]) and its dismissal for nonappearance was an improvident exercise of discretion.

Concur — Markewich, J.P., Kupferman, Murphy, Capozzoli and Lynch, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

COTTER v. CITY OF NEW YORK
(Jun 26, 1975)