Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Charles E. Leib, Appellant

Unemployment compensation — Pensions — Unemployment Compensation Law, Act 1936, December 5, P.L. (1937) 2897.

1. The Unemployment Compensation Law, Act 1936, December 5, P.L. (1937), requires that benefits paid thereunder be reduced by the amount of retirement pension benefits received by the claimant. [207]

OPINION BY JUDGE ROGERS, July 10, 1975:

The sole question in this case is whether pension benefits paid to the appellant are to be offset against unemployment compensation benefits pursuant to Section 404(d)(iii) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex. Sess. P.L. (1937) 2897, as amended, 43 P. S. § 804(d)(iii) (Supp. 1974-1975). We have twice squarely held that they are. Etter v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 12 Pa. Commw. 642, 316 A.2d 659 (1974); Ettelson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 12 Pa. Commw. 617, 316 A.2d 661 (1974). The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania denied the prayer of a petition for allocatur in Etter and we adhere to our prior determination.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 10th day of July, 1975, it is ordered that the instant appeal be and it is dismissed, and the decision of the Unemployment Compensation Board of Review be and it is affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

UNEMP. COMP. BD. REVIEW v. LEIB
(Jul 10, 1975)