Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

ESTELLE WOLINER, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JACK WOLINER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES, Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD and SCHREIBER and Judge CONFORD — 7.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WOLINER v. WOLINER
(Sep 23, 1975)