Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Randy CHICK et al., Petitioners, v. Linda CRAVENS, Executrix, Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The application of Randy Chick, et al., for writ of error is refused, no reversible error. In taking such action, we do not necessarily approve the holding that the testamentary nature of the codicil to the will was a question of fact. The respondent, Linda Cravens, Executrix, did not file an application for writ of error seeking rendition of judgment rather than a remand.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CHICK v. CRAVENS
(Oct 1, 1975)