Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HARKINS v. BOYD.

CLARK, Judge.

In this dispossessory proceeding predicated on nonpayment of rent, the tenant appeals from an adverse judgment.

1. "Prerequisite to the right to seek a dispossessory warrant is a demand for possession of property by the landlord. Code § 61-301." Terrell v. Griffith, 129 Ga. App. 675, 677 ( 200 S.E.2d 485). Relying upon this principle, tenant contends landlord failed to show that this prerequisite demand for the premises was made. Thus, tenant continues, the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment. We disagree. Landlord introduced in evidence a letter calling upon tenant to pay the two months rent then due or be "removed" under a dispossessory warrant. Landlord testified this letter was mailed to tenant. The denial of tenant's motion was therefore not erroneous. See Bussell v. Swift, 50 Ga. App. 148 ( 177 S.E. 277).

2. Tenant's assertion that this demand letter was inadmissible is without merit. The rules governing the admissibility of business records apply to letters made in the regular course of business. See 32 CJS 976, Evidence § 703.

3. The Supreme Court disposed of the remaining enumeration of error by transferring the appeal to this court.

Judgment affirmed. Pannell, P. J., and Quillian, J., concur.

ARGUED SEPTEMBER 4, 1975 — DECIDED OCTOBER 2, 1975 — REHEARING DENIED OCTOBER 28, 1975 — CERT. APPLIED FOR.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HARKINS v. BOYD
(Oct 2, 1975)