AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

GREGG S. MORAN, Respondent, v. HEARST CORPORATION et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants. DANIEL D. MORAN, Respondent,

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on May 3, 1975, denying defendants-appellants' motions to dismiss the complaints herein for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously reversed, on the law, and complaints dismissed, with $60 costs and disbursements to appellants. The article and language involved in these actions did not constitute libel per se in that it did not tend "to expose [plaintiffs] to hatred, contempt or aversion, or to induce an evil or unsavory opinion of [them] in the minds of a substantial number of the community", (Mencher v Chesley, 297 N.Y. 94, 100) and, since no special damages are claimed, Special Term clearly erred in failing to grant the motions to dismiss.

Concur — Markewich, J.P., Tilzer, Capozzoli, Lane and Nunez, JJ.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MORAN v. HEARST CORPORATION
(Nov 6, 1975)