Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

MARY ELIZABETH WORTHINGTON v. SOLOMAN ALLEY WORTHINGTON

Appeal and Error 57 — findings supported by evidence — court on appeal bound The court on appeal is bound by the findings of fact made by the trial court where there is some evidence to support those findings.

Defendant, age 68, appeals from an order directing him to pay alimony pendente lite and counsel fees to plaintiff from whom he was separated on 29 December 1974 following their marriage on 26 December 1974.

VAUGHN, Judge.

Although we express no opinion on whether we would have reached the same result on the evidence before the court at the hearing for alimony pendente lite, there is some evidence to support the findings of fact made by the trial judge, and we are bound by them. The findings of fact are sufficient to support the order and it is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Judges MORRIS and CLARK concur.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WORTHINGTON v. WORTHINGTON
(Nov 1, 1975)