AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

CLARENCE E. EDMOND, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DEPARTMENT OF THE PUBLIC ADVOCATE, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from the refusal of the Public Advocate to institute an action on his behalf to compel the Division of Civil Rights to reopen proceedings on a complaint which plaintiff had filed in 1968 charging a board of education with discrimination against him because he is black. The Public Advocate refused to do so since there was no broad public interest involved. N.J.S.A. 52:27E-32(b).

The appeal is clearly without merit. The statute reposes in the Public Advocate the "sole discretion to represent or refrain from representing the public interest in any proceeding * * *." N.J.S.A. 52:27E-31. The record contains ample support for the action of the Public Advocate.

Affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

EDMOND v. DEPT. OF THE PUBLIC ADVOCATE
(Nov 14, 1975)