Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)

In the Matter of ERNEST K. JONES, Appellant, v. THOMAS F. McCOY, as Administrator of the Judicial Conference of the State of New York, et al., Respondents.

MEMORANDUM. Before an employee of the unified court system may seek judicial relief, he must exhaust whatever administrative remedies have been made available to him (Matter of Kalichstein v McCoy, 23 N.Y.2d 978, 980). Since petitioner had not exhausted his available remedy under 22 N.Y.CRR 25.5, the court below properly dismissed this article 78 proceeding in the nature of mandamus. Moreover, the extraordinary remedy is available only when there is a clear legal right and is still subject to the exercise of discretion by the courts below, which this court might or might not have the power to review.

Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE concur; Chief Judge BREITEL taking no part.

Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MATTER OF JONES v. McCOY
(Nov 19, 1975)