Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

WILES et al. v. BROTHERS.

WEBB, Judge.

In this contested adoption case, the trial court erred in failing to make findings of fact and conclusions of law as required by CPA § 52 (a) (Code Ann. § 81A-152 (a)). Githens v. Githens, 234 Ga. 715 ( 217 S.E.2d 291); Avery v. Avery, 234 Ga. 729 ( 218 S.E.2d 19). We remand the appeal with direction that the trial court vacate the judgment, cause appropriate findings of fact and conclusions of law to be made, and enter a new judgment thereon, after which the losing party shall be free to enter a new appeal. Hagin v. Powers, 136 Ga. App. 395, and cases cited.

Appeal remanded with direction. Bell, C. J., and Marshall, J., concur.

SUBMITTED NOVEMBER 3, 1975 — DECIDED NOVEMBER 18, 1975.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WILES v. BROTHERS
(Nov 18, 1975)