Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

BALDWIN v. THE STATE.

STOLZ, Judge.

Rayfield Baldwin was indicted, tried, and convicted of arson in the first degree. On the afternoon before the trial, defense counsel requested and received a list of the ten state witnesses, six of whose names had been written on the indictment that afternoon by the district attorney. When the case was called the following day, the defendant moved for a continuance, which was denied. Held:

The defendant, having demanded the list of witnesses within the time prescribed by Code Ann. § 27-1403, was entitled to a continuance absent a showing by the state that the defendant otherwise was put on notice as to the scheduled witnesses or, alternatively, could not have been prejudiced thereby. Parham v. State, 135 Ga. App. 315 ( 217 S.E.2d 493).

Since we reverse this case on the above ground, it is unnecessary to reach the appellant's other enumerations of error.

Judgment reversed. Deen, P. J., and Evans, J., concur.

ARGUED OCTOBER 30, 1975 — DECIDED NOVEMBER 21, 1975 — REHEARING DENIED DECEMBER 10, 1975 — CERT. APPLIED FOR.
Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BALDWIN v. STATE
(Nov 21, 1975)