Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Attorney(S)
Judges

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. QUINCY H. LUCARELLO,DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed substantially for the reasons set forth in its majority opinion reported at 135 N.J. Super. 347 (1975).

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES, Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD and SCHREIBER and Judge CONFORD — 7.

For reversal — None.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. LUCARELLO
(Dec 3, 1975)